In recent years, people have used cars as a means of transportation, which actually emits a great amount of carbon, so our air quality has worsened. The government thinks that stopping those private vehicles from entering the city center might be a good way to make our air quality better. In my opinion, this idea is completely infeasible despite some benefits.
Admittedly, there is no doubt that this policy can indeed reduce air pollution because driving less on the road will contribute to fewer carbon dioxide emissions. According to a report released by a city expert group in 2018, one liter of gasoline will produce approximately 2.67 kilograms of carbon dioxide, while current cars generally consume about 8 liter of fuel for 100 kilometres. There are about 10,000 vehicles in Vancouver, and each person travels about 30 kilometres per day. The total carbon emissions per day are about 60,000 kg. If private vehicles are banned from entering urban districts, we will reduce carbon emissions by about 60,000 kg. However, this does not necessarily imply that the move towards a vehicle-free city is utterly workable.
In fact, restricting all vehicle travels will severely increase the burden on public transportation because there is a surge in the number of new commuters who once depended on driving their cars to work or school. If the government cannot provide alternative methods of transportation for thousands of people to enter the city, the existing public transport and facilities will be overwhelmed. For example, it is not possible to simply add additional bus services in Rome, as most of them need to enter and exit the city during peak hours. As a result, the prohibition of driving in the city center will result in more protests and inconvenience.
Another repercussion is an increase of the expenditure spent on public transportation. A recent study has illustrated that 77 percent of people who rely on public transportation have to spend twice the amount of commuting expenses than those driving their private cars. In addition, the initiative to inhibit cars from central areas is a recipe for the socially and economically disadvantaged, on the grounds that they are forced to squeeze the monthly commuting fees out of their limited budget.
In conclusion, both of the two views have their pros and cons, but still, I maintain that restricting all private cars is an unwise idea. Although this eco-friendly proposal helps create a less polluted city, it increases the burden on the public transport system and the poor. Hence, it is justifiable to argue that the government should take the negative effects into consideration before the implementation of this policy.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, hence, however, if, so, still, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, no doubt, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2263.0 1615.20841683 140% => OK
No of words: 440.0 315.596192385 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14318181818 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90928177641 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 176.041082164 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568181818182 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 711.0 506.74238477 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9113909738 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.105263158 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1578947368 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.31578947368 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245188685207 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0674349593737 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0431831994922 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119462798919 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0367723181697 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, hence, however, if, so, still, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, no doubt, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2263.0 1615.20841683 140% => OK
No of words: 440.0 315.596192385 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14318181818 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90928177641 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 176.041082164 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568181818182 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 711.0 506.74238477 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9113909738 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.105263158 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1578947368 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.31578947368 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245188685207 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0674349593737 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0431831994922 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119462798919 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0367723181697 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.