In some cities, there are few controls on the design and construction of homes and other buildings, and owners can decide on the style of their houses. Do the advantages of this outweigh the drawbacks?

People from all over the world have a tendency to live or work at a place which has all luxuries. Many of them design their homes and workplaces in such a way to have all the world-class facilities. However, by providing the right to construct buildings (especially houses) to the people, authorities don’t have much control on the designs of these buildings. Though people have the advantage to make their dream of living in a palace to come true but this generates multiple adversities that cannot be overlooked.

Firstly, with the growing population, more and more space is required to construct housing facilities. Though not all of us can afford to live a big house but still there is a large population which is rich enough to construct their own homes. These people don’t follow the rules and regulation set by the authorities while constructing their houses. They even occupy the space left for roads and drainage facilities illegally to obtain the interior design which they have in the mind for their buildings. This generates multiple other issues such as traffic jams and water blockage along with legal issues.

Next, though people get be benefitted by their own designs in many ways but they should also be made accountable and responsible, if a building is not being constructed as per the rules. They should be made aware of the fact that not building the structure as per the prescribed regulations will land them in legal trouble which may lead to the demolishing of the house as well.

In essence, by the giving the right to construct a building in their own way only few people can be benefitted. However, if a building is constructed in a wrong way, it will become a cause of trouble to the neighbors and other people for their lifetime. Hence, in my opinion, the right to design a building themselves by the people has more detrimental effects on the society than advantages.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 151, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a wrong way" with adverb for "wrong"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
.... However, if a building is constructed in a wrong way, it will become a cause of trouble to t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, look, may, so, still, well, while, such as, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1590.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8623853211 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72397596844 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.504587155963 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.9133911938 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.571428571 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3571428571 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192790859746 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0719882626556 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411011580108 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117952740052 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0442754024703 0.056905535591 78% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.