In some cities, there are few controls over the design and construction of new homes and office buildings, so people can build in whatever style they like. Do you think advantages outweigh disadvantages?
Several locations limited their citizens from designing their own houses and received negative reactions. In fact, many believe they should have complete control over their homes. In my point of view, I think this restriction is somewhat more beneficial.
On the one hand, allowing individuals to create their owns buildings brings satisfaction and freedom. In a psychological facet, most people enjoy doing things on their own without external interruptions. No citizen wants to see their properties designed and conditioned with another man’s idea. A recent survey occurred in Hanoi stated that 91% of their locals disagreed to build their house similarly or followed the same blueprint. Moreover, constructing self-designed buildings promotes distinction. A location occupied with creative houses vary from sizes and styles replaces the boring and plain appearance with an independent look.
However, the government’s restriction provides a uniform and unique view. Even though these houses might not be beautiful standing alone but they became a gorgeous landscape integrating together. Additionally, some cities have an old-fashioned, vintage look with the settings of their houses. For example, Hoi An in Vietnam is famous for its classic housing styles, which have been maintained since the Second World War. These antique apartments are substantial tourist attractions and historical locations. Without the prohibition of the authority, this vivid land will soon be replaced by modern construction, losing their long-lasting beauty and the town’s source of income from international visitors.
In conclusion, there are both merits and demerits to imposing restrictions on local housing and the office’s design. However, I believe this method is more advantageous for the view of the city.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 201, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... advantageous for the view of the city.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, moreover, second, similarly, so, for example, i think, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1564.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.83582089552 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11211925467 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.708955223881 0.561755894193 126% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.3287610175 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7647058824 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94117647059 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107265888142 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0366939337466 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0351935425428 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.068926140107 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0291846820508 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.3 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.74 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.