Some companies have uniform for their staff which must be wore all the time. What are the advantages for a company of having a uniform ? Are there any benefits of having a uniform for the staff?
With the rise in the modernisation. A man has transformed his life tremendously. He has progressed from walking bare footed in the jungles to take the first step on the moon. Neverthless, one on the most pressing concern regarding the given topis is that Is wore uniform for the staff of the company all the time profitable for them? I will explore the dimensions of this topic through examples and obsevations.
To the begin, with my point of view, I tend to believe that wore uniform for the staff of the companies becomes salubrious for them. There are many advantages of that. The first and faremost advantage is that, the uniform wore by the staff of the company becomes the label of that particular company. Moreover,everyone know more about that company whereas wore formal uniform in the company symbolize the dignity of that company.
Furtheremore, the profit to the is the company ia that it becomes more wide spread. Apart from that, company got more acquiaition. For instance, a survey is conducted by the multinational companies is that, 70 out of 100 companies provide a formal uniform to their staff which represents the mark of that company. The best illuatration is that, in international companies, all the staff members wore a formal uniform provided by the company and all that companies becomes far-famed all over the word.
Second advantage of wore uniform by the staff of the companies is that, it becomes very valuabe when we went to other contries or other cities for meeting, seminars and for conference also. Afterthat, it can differentiate us from the members of other companies. For example, when there was any meeting between the staff of all the companies, the member of the company differentiate with the help of uniform. Last but not the least, the one more advantage of wore uniform by the staff of company is that, the companys standard raised to the higher postion because the company becomes more natorius and moreover, automatically, other companies were inclined to do partnership with the company.
In conclusion, we can see that, there are many answers to this question. I tend to believe that every company should have to provide uniform for the staff of the company and it was the responsibility of the staff to wore that uniform all the time
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 4, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...through examples and obsevations. To the begin, with my point of view, I tend to belie...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 310, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , everyone
...bel of that particular company. Moreover,everyone know more about that company whereas wo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 482, Rule ID: ALL_OVER_THE_WORD[1]
Message: Did you mean 'all over the world' (=globally)?
Suggestion: all over the world
...nd all that companies becomes far-famed all over the word. Second advantage of wore uniform by...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 185, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...or meeting, seminars and for conference also. Afterthat, it can differentiate us fro...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, regarding, second, so, whereas, apart from, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 7.30460921844 287% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1910.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 388.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92268041237 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83049774854 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.430412371134 0.561755894193 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 610.2 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.5917501143 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.526315789 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4210526316 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.10526315789 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 3.4128256513 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.510845528804 0.244688304435 209% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164916254719 0.084324248473 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.158362746323 0.0667982634062 237% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.33501965294 0.151304729494 221% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0734515963933 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.