Some countries allow old people to work to any age that they want. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
In this day and age, with the advent of modern society, certain nations permit the elderly to work at any age to meet people’s daily life demands. Therefore, there has been a debate whether it is a positive thing to let the aged go to work or not. According to my mind, the benefits of this trend are far more significant than its drawbacks.
On the one hand, there is a wide range of compelling reasons to explain why the governments allow the elderly to go to work. One evident strength is that because they are persons who used to undergo rigorous training and have many hands-on experiences in their life. Thus, they are able to apply those things to their job and give the best advice for the next generation so as to have many good performances in work and generate substantial revenue to their company or society. Another underlying reason is that they will be likely to alleviate the financial burden for their family when they get older. They can both live up to the fullest of their lives and pay other necessary expenses without being contingent upon their family such as accommodation or healthcare service. In fact, They can comfortably enjoy and live the life they want when they are retired.
On the other hand, the aforementioned advantages are also at the expense of greater disadvantages. First of all, when people are old, they are fairly weak and easily contract some serious diseases such as cardiovascular diseases, so they also can not guarantee stable working hours. As a result, this leads to a decline in the quality of the work. For instance, people who are over 60 years old, do not have enough strength to work eight hours a day. It takes them a large amount of time to finish works on time. Consequently, this will be likely to cause some troubles for the enterprises when collaborating with others. Furthermore, it also puts enormous pressure on the shoulder of the owner of companies when they have to spend money to have a better healthcare system for the old working in their enterprises.
In conclusion, there are minus points to let the elderly people work to any age. With that being said, it seems to me that its advantages would surpass its disadvantages in this trend.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 372, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...the best advice for the next generation so as to have many good performances in work and...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, thus, as to, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1844.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 388.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75257731959 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6500761504 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551546391753 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.76291228 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.444444444 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5555555556 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.05555555556 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306044931643 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0886022999936 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610405989654 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176050772174 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391049950335 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.