These days, several nations allow their elderly to work until they want. In my opinion, this trend is more advantageous to some extent.
On the one hand, the primary drawback this trend induces is that most older adults have trouble meeting high-demand requirements that several jobs want. For instance, a 70-year-old mason will be more likely to get a severe incident during the working process under extreme conditions than his counterparts who are at least 40 years older than him. Therefore, this continuing can lead to a higher risk of his death, which should be deemed one of the pressing problems.
On the other hand, permitting the elderly to enter the workforce until they want is more significant. Firstly, the increased number of old individuals enjoy working, which offers them happiness and optimism. Many over 60-year-old teachers in Vietnam, for instance, opt to devote themselves to every lecture in school, which enables them to get appreciation and love from their students. As a result, they feel positive and joyful whenever they teach. Moreover, people, regardless of age, desire to have a contribution to their nation’s development. Given the fact that the majority of Japanese elderlies nowadays keep working in an effort to contribute to the country, which can also be considered patriotism for youngsters to look for.
In conclusion, I reaffirm that despite the drawback mentioned above, this development is of paramount importance overall considering its benefits to individuals and society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 66, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'older' (without 'most') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: older
...ary drawback this trend induces is that most older adults have trouble meeting high-demand...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, at least, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1284.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 241.0 315.596192385 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32780082988 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86637610609 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.659751037344 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2183903674 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0833333333 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1666666667 7.06120827912 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156789044735 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0591092748972 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525113166107 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0979202093032 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0856829122268 0.056905535591 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.