The older laborers are permitted to work indefinitely as long as they want in some people. From my perspective, this development is more disadvantageous overall considering increased unemployment rates.
On the one hand, several benefits are arising from this trend to individuals. The first one is that elderly, regardless of age, desire to devote themselves to the growth of their nation. The majority of Japanese older adults, for instance, keep working to have a contribution to society, which should be considered patriotism for youngsters to look up to. Moreover, working can provide the old laborers with happiness and consciousness for the rest of their lives. A teacher named Le Thi Hoa, 64 years old, has been teaching for over 35 years, which allows her to be stack with passion and enjoyment whenever joining the class. Therefore, working is an excellent tool to enable older people to avoid being pessimistic.
However, I believe the drawback this trend induces outnumbers the aforementioned benefits. The primary disadvantage is the development of the unemployment rate. As elderly workers are rich in profession and experience, they are more likely to meet the company’s requirements effortlessly than those younger. This can lead to an unnecessary redundancy of young workers and graduates available on the employment market. Therefore, the number of unemployed workers would be increased dramatically, leading to its negative impacts on the nation’s long-term development.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that the drawback this development poses outweighs the advantages mentioned above.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, look, moreover, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1368.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 248.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51612903226 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2103561448 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.645161290323 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.2820078595 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7142857143 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7142857143 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64285714286 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174853602965 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0525004572126 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529804704878 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10028723792 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0481891525969 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.44 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.