In recent years, residing with parents after graduating from college or securing a job has gained traction due to economic upheaval. While this tendency brings some merits, I firmly assume that this is disadvantageous overall considering the risks to both individuals and society.
On the one hand, staying under the same roof with parents provides young adults with several advantages. The first advantage is that it helps to forge a strong bond between family members. This happens because people after finishing college have greater amounts of time for face-to-face interactions and inmate conversations with their family members. Another advantage of living together is financial support. Due to escalation prices, young adults have trouble saving money resulting from living separately. Therefore, sharing accommodation helps grown-ups to mitigate financial burden, especially in major cities, by sharing bills and other expenses.
On the other hand, I believe detrimental effects arising from housing with parents must be highlighted. As one’s caregivers handle many problems, he tends to become less confident in making decisions and independence. Another potential drawback is inadequate motivation to strive in life. This happens because of greater dependence on their guardians. Consequently, they might find it harder to make ends meet by themselves and suffer from psychological illnesses like autism due to negative opinions from society.
In conclusion, I reaffirm that although this phenomenon can forge a strong bond between family members, over-reliance on family is of paramount disadvantageous to individuals and society at large.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1411.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 244.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.78278688525 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0195629953 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.655737704918 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.2601869477 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.785714286 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4285714286 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64285714286 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270749800211 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0776905484706 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625930371347 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146864163532 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0802023377821 0.056905535591 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.