It is argued that watching programs on television or playing video games pale in comparison with reading books. Personally, I agree with this statement and will state my preference in the essay below.
On the one hand, playing video games and watching television should be considered excellent relaxation tools for those children who suffer from high-stress levels. It is not uncommon nowadays that most children in Asia have to engage in extra classes after finishing their mandatory class at school, resulting in detrimental effects on their mental wellbeing. As a result, watching television allows them to recuperate spiritual strength before the repetition of stringent timetable on the following days. Besides, playing video games enables children to not only cement relations between their peers but also naturally study a few useful lessons while enjoying it.
On the other hand, reading stories helps children develop their creativity and imagination. When settling down with a book, children can not only immerse themselves in a virtual world full of fictional figures but also visualize the settings and the progress of the plot, described by words in the book. A study by scientists has shown solid evidence that when people read books, the brain will increase connections between neurons to help enhance their memory and creativity. Moreover, with the repetition of enjoying books, children can nurture their patience and concentration, which are among crucial features in personal and career success.
In conclusion, I believe although both watching television and playing video games offer several benefits mentioned above, reading stories from a book is more beneficial overall considering their advantages on a children’s cognitive development.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, moreover, so, well, while, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1498.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5687732342 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79582079573 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64312267658 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8798358387 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.181818182 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4545454545 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.36363636364 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209814574782 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0806202191271 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514903304408 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133129675935 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0241376461359 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.