Although high-income nations frequently donate financial assistance to low-income nations, it can not untangle the problem of poverty. As a result, affluent nations had better types of help rather than financial aid. I strongly agree with the statement and this essay will extent several reasons.
The first reason why rich countries should change how they help poorer ones is mainly because of the corruption issue in these countries leading to the tremendous loss of money. For instance, even if the USA poured a substantial sum of money on the African continent to help them solve the problem of poverty, nothing has tremendously changed during 5 years and the disappearance of financial support led to social unrest and political instability. Therefore, citizens in financially disadvantaged nations have kept struggling in making ends meet, while their authorities have posed the loss of national coffers in ineffective projects.
In addition, the second reason why I believe developed nations should not donate financial help to disadvantaged nations is that these countries have not found out the right solution for poverty. For example, despite exploiting the tremendous amount of natural resources like lead, and subsequently sells them for China, North Korea annually asks Western countries for aid to handle the poverty due to the fact that the money has been spent for developing and researching the latest weapons. For this reason, the North Korean authorities have solved the problem of poverty for years.
In conclusion, although financial aid donated by affluent nations can improve certain aspects of poverty in poorer ones, it is not an effective solution to deal with the problem.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1438.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38576779026 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79994549296 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602996254682 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.9747138071 49.4020404114 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.8 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267840702497 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10634581038 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730692820562 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147080715789 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.063156494547 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.