Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Although high-income nations frequently donate financial assistance to low-income nations, it can not untangle the problem of poverty. As a result, affluent nations had better types of help rather than financial aid. I strongly agree with the statement and this essay will extent several reasons.
The first reason why rich countries should change how they help poorer ones is mainly because of the corruption issue in these countries leading to the tremendous loss of money. For instance, even if the USA poured a substantial sum of money on the African continent to help them solve the problem of poverty, nothing has tremendously changed during 5 years and the disappearance of financial support led to social unrest and political instability. Therefore, citizens in financially disadvantaged nations have kept struggling in making ends meet, while their authorities have posed the loss of national coffers in ineffective projects.
In addition, the second reason why I believe developed nations should not donate financial help to disadvantaged nations is that these countries have not found out the right solution for poverty. For example, despite exploiting the tremendous amount of natural resources like lead, and subsequently sells them for China, North Korea annually asks Western countries for aid to handle the poverty due to the fact that the money has been spent for developing and researching the latest weapons. For this reason, the North Korean authorities have solved the problem of poverty for years.
In conclusion, although financial aid donated by affluent nations can improve certain aspects of poverty in poorer ones, it is not an effective solution to deal with the problem.
- In some countries more and more adults are living with their parents after graduating from college University or even after finding a job Do the advantages of this outweigh disadvantages 56
- You see a request for articles in a magazine We invite you to write about The Future of Travel In what ways do you think travel will be different in the future In what ways might it still be the same The writer of the best article will win a prize Write y 78
- People say that it is a waste of time for highschool students to learn literature such as novels and poems Do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people believe that hosting international sports events is good for the country while some people think it is bad Discuss both these views and state your opinion 56
- Nowadays many people prefer to shop in supermarket rather than small shops or local markets Is this positive or negative for development Discuss and give your opinion 49
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1637.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36721311475 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76821130315 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567213114754 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.5371516913 49.4020404114 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.923076923 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4615384615 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.61538461538 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.466365774842 0.244688304435 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.182270577565 0.084324248473 216% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.168806862228 0.0667982634062 253% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.28347937962 0.151304729494 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.278584594373 0.056905535591 490% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.