It is argued that house designs should be similar to the old ones in local areas. While Some people have the opposite opinion, I agree with this statement to some extent.
On the one hand, proponents of this topic have several reasons to oppose this idea. The first one is that individuals have their own rights to design and build their houses as their wishes if permitted regulations by local authorities. This is because people nowadays have different tastes in house design compared to their ancestors. Moreover, thanks to higher living standards in modern society, affluent people desire to settle down in a house with a modern design, which hardly maintains the traditional designs of the old houses. The decreased number of houses with traditional designs in the North West of Vietnam in which ethnic minorities live takes as a perfect example.
On the other hand, I believe the maintenance of the old styles in the newly built houses in indigenous places is more beneficial to locals in fostering income sources. With the synchronization of houses with the same old designs in local areas, people in such places can do business to make ends meet by selling either traditional beverages and food or souvenirs to visitors. Locals in Hoi An ancient town of Vietnam have successfully preserved its traditional buildings and built new houses strictly adhered to the old designs. As a result, this place has been well-known worldwide as one of the most attractive ancestral destinations, enabling locals to profit from the tourism industry.
In conclusion, I reaffirm that keeping new houses in a similar fashion to the other buildings in the area is more beneficial overall considering its advantages to locals.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 51, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a similar fashion" with adverb for "similar"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ion, I reaffirm that keeping new houses in a similar fashion to the other buildings in the area is m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, so, well, while, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1435.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07067137809 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76225660584 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551236749117 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2735798763 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.583333333 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5833333333 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.91666666667 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344855033663 0.244688304435 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130110443635 0.084324248473 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686057591424 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207769325763 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.055885334595 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.