Some people think that newly built houses should follow the style of the old houses in the local areas, while others think that people should have the freedom to build houses of their own styles. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
There are more and more houses which are specially designed for this modern society because of its developed functions. Some people believe that new houses should be constructed in the same style as other traditional ones in a locality, others argue that they should have the right to build their houses based on their favourite. I do agree with the former idea because of several reasons.
On the one hand, some people think that society should welcome change and allow citizens to build houses in modern styles. It is essential to respect their own decision since we are living in the 21st century, we can do things we would love to within the laws. Therefore, as citizens, they are free to design and construct their fashionable houses, which are evidence for their sophistication. Additionally, modern houses are far more affordable than traditional counterparts. Building materials like stones and wood are quite difficult and expensive to buy nowadays. In fact, not only building materials but also maintenance costs are definitely high. Consequently, to construct a modern style house is much easier and cheaper than the another.
On the other hand, there are strong arguments that new houses should adopt the architectural style of the local area. In terms of the tangible cultural heritage of a small town or a village, houses with traditional styles and characteristics appear as a strong sense of identity. Only traditional houses have a link to our roots since they represent our lifestyles, economic situation and also solidarity. From an architectural perspective, the mixing of modern and traditional buildings is an eyesore. The former is failed to blend in with the latter due to the lack of unity among each other and the beauty of the village also be affected severely. For example, Hoi An Ancient town in Vietnam is one of the traditional towns and it still keeps the old structure of houses since hundred years ago. Consequently, Hoi An is a great destination for tourism and architectural and historical studies as well.
From all the above-mentioned, although it is costly, citizens should respect the traditional aspect of a community in constructing houses. Tradition is an important factor in our lives, especially the next generation; therefore, it is worth preserving.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-06 | trieu23012021 | 78 | view |
| 2019-01-14 | huathibichngoc.c3.ltt@gmail.com | 82 | view |
| 2021-08-06 | trieu23012021 | 73 | view |
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 78
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989. 84
- The charts show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world 85
- The maps below shoe the center of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development. 73
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projection until 2030. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 781, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...keeps the old structure of houses since hundred years ago. Consequently, Hoi An is a gr...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, so, still, therefore, well, for example, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1936.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 374.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17647058824 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96382625406 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 612.9 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.1263007375 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.894736842 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6842105263 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05263157895 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291448084276 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0824357850247 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0976577704864 0.0667982634062 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171097881807 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0938383881712 0.056905535591 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.