International sporting events have been deemed beneficial to the host country. While some people have the opposite claim, I am on the side of those who support the statement. This essay will state both sides of the argument before my opinion is presented.
On the one side, the primary drawback of hosting an overseas sports competition is that many state fundings must be allocated to preparation. This means that resources must be allotted to restore existing facilities and construction of strict regulations-qualified stadiums, which frequently take a few years to get ready for the event. For instance, the Olympic Tokyo 2020 took Japan nearly 15 billion dollars for preparation and operation.
On the other hand, I believe the drawback mentioned above pale in comparison with the benefits of hosting an international sports event. Firstly, the hosting country has incredible chances to promote its local images with the rest of the world. Because of a global event, thousands of TV stations across the globe will come to report the latest news relating to their national teams and locals of the hosting country to their viewers, which can help the country widespread its beautiful images globally. Moreover, a hosting country can cement international relations with the other countries if they organise the event successfully. Russia, a World Cup 2018 host country, had put enormous efforts in preparation for the event, resulting in long-term bilateral relations with European nations until now.
In conclusion, I reaffirm that despite the aforementioned disadvantage, becoming a host country of a worldwide sports event is more beneficial overall.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 112, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
... becoming a host country of a worldwide sports event is more beneficial overall.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, moreover, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1399.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38076923077 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02663472383 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.630769230769 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7412052528 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.583333333 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292827246291 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101023678578 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424939323835 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159892596055 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0610933759578 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.