International sports events have been common in recent decades. Despite the drawback of this, I believe this development is more beneficial. This essay will shed light on both sides of the argument and present my preference.
On the one hand, the primary disadvantage is the high investment in the preparation process. This means that host countries should allocate their resources to newly built facilities, including stadiums and indoor athletic areas, to meet world-class standards. Besides, accommodations must be set up to cater for thousands of professional athletes and journalists worldwide. Japan, for instance, had spent nearly 15 billion dollars preparing and operating the Olympic Tokyo 2020 amid the surge of the highly transmissible Delta variant.
On the other hand, I believe the drawback mentioned above pale in comparison with the benefits of hosting an overseas sports competition. The first one is that hosting countries have incredible chances to promote their profiles with the rest of the world. Thanks to technological advances, the latest news of international sports events will be updated up to the minute on social media platforms like Tiktok by athletes and journalists. Therefore, the countries can promote their beautiful images globally, boosting the tourism industry. Moreover, preparation for international sports events allows host nations to deal with the unemployment rate because thousands of builders are employed to construct facilities to serve these events.
In conclusion, I believe that despite the aforementioned drawback, becoming a host nation of an overseas sports event is more beneficial overall.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, moreover, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1402.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 248.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65322580645 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07032556311 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.633064516129 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9532855536 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.846153846 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0769230769 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182242555814 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603520910752 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0421674817084 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106796728449 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422528776826 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.56 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.