Some people believe that hosting international sports events is good for the country, while some people think it is bad.
Discuss both these views and state your opinion.
It is undoubtedly the case that the race for organizing global sporting events is fiercely competitive. Yet some argue that hosting such events is problematic. Others and I opine that their arguments are not plausible, for these ignore the far-reaching benefits to a nation.
On the one hand, it is widely believed that international sporting events would induce some serious problems in the host country. One of the evident problems is that it is necessary for the government to erect or renovate existing sports facilities, which means that an enormous quantity of money must be allocated to such investments. Other pivotal sectors such as health or education, consequently, may be negatively affected by a shortage of income for their development. Another matter is that once a tournament is commenced, spectators from many corners of the world, particularly from neighboring states, would swarm to the host country. This massive movement might undermine the national security, since criminals and terrorists could enter the country for illegal purposes.
On the other hand, I deem that holding world-class sports events such as the Olympics Games or FIFA World Cup would offer a great number of merits to the host nation. For starters, these types of international occasions can establish reputation and dignity of the host country. For instance, there is a strong likelihood that a persistent increase in recognition and tourism is attached to the states hosting the Olympic Games. Another significant advantage is that increasing profile of a country can then lead to economic profits. There would be long-term investments and lucrative sponsorships from large multinational corporations in preparation for major events. The host country’s both overall infrastructure and local facilities could eventually be modernized with a view to catering for influxes of visitors.
In summary, although there exist a handful of drawbacks to organizing sports event on the international stage, I would contend that the positive points as regards the promotion for the country’s image and financial gains are long-lasting and sustainable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-22 | Euphemia_7763 | 56 | view |
| 2021-01-30 | xuanhieu26 | 56 | view |
| 2021-04-26 | Luc1Ferrr | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-13 | trieu23012021 | 61 | view |
| 2021-08-28 | Sanaullah97 | 84 | view |
- The chart below shows the number of films produced by five countries in three years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
- The graph below shows the percentage of the Australian workforce in five industries between 1962 and 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- In many countries fast food is becoming cheaper and more available Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvanatages 84
- The graph below shows female unemployment rates in each country of the United Kingdom in 2013 and 2014 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The picture below shows the difference in the layout of the conference center in 2010 and 2025 as proposed Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 276, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the far-reaching benefits to a nation. On the one hand, it is widely believed t...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, if, may, so, then, as regards, for instance, in summary, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1811.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48787878788 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09939565779 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578787878788 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4139479309 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.733333333 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46666666667 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255905945816 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0875693962058 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595605726641 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157282034592 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.030623277489 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.42 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.