Commuting by bike have multiple merits, such as keeping fitness and saving money. Yet, people in certain countries do not choose bicycle as their prominent means of commuting, even though riding bike generates physical and financial benefits. This essay will delve the underlying reason of this phenomenon and suggest viable solution to change the situation.
Some countries are not popular with riding a bicycle as a means of transportation mainly because the limitation of special facility for bicycle. Using bike to commute necessitates the comprehensive road and parklot specially for it. Therefore, bikers have to ride on driver' s lane or pedestrain' s sideway and they even could not find a place to park bikes. Besides, riding on driver' s lane is dangerous due to the unexpected bicycle that ridden on a busy road. Take China for example, numerous accidents happened as the result of riders riding on driver' s lane.
The only possible solution to this dilema is to contrust sufficient facilities for bicycle. With adequate lane specificly allocated to riders, they can safely ride on road without wary about cars and pedestrains. Also, the exclusive parking area for bicycles allow riders own their specific place to park bikes. As enough facilities built for bikes, people absolutely will be attract to consider riding bike as their first choice for commuting. Thus, more people will enjoy riding bikes and benefit from this kind of transportation, as it is happing in Australia.
To recapitulate, insufficiency in facilities for bike rider sesult in people's rlactance in commuting by bicycle. The only solution to this problem is to contruct sufficient facilities for bike riders. And this approach will definitly appeal more people to consider bike as a preferable means of commuting.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 130, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to bicycle'
Suggestion: to bicycle
...ople in certain countries do not choose bicycle as their prominent means of commuting, ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, if, so, therefore, thus, for example, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1515.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26041666667 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82180174785 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.031133915 49.4020404114 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.6875 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231121286482 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0777456479832 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689767348242 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137367079234 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.04000637258 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.