It is common scence that perpetrators will be judged and punished according to the law in democratic countries. Some people insist that entrenched punishment must apply to every crime. Whereas, others claim that the situation and consequence of a crime should be considered when convicting a criminal. This essay will discuss the two views and express the writer's opinion on this issue.
The suggestion of applying fixed sentence to each type of crime is unreasonable. For example, if two people committed the same crime of homicide and one resulted in one victim while the other caused two decease of people, the judge absolutely apply heavier punishment on the severer one. To apply the same sentence on all crime under the same category is compeletely unrational in trail. Therefore, the writer object this approach regarding crime judement and believe that there must be a realistic approach to solve the problem of appropriate sentence to criminals according their illegal conduct.
By contrast, the view that others believe accurate circumstance and result should take into consideration when deciding the punishment is comparetively reasonable. Actually, the juryprudence of convicting a respondant requires the consideration of the actual motivation, consequence and situation. The jury generates the final judement according to the comprehensive study of the case and the law. It is a more rational approach to consider all the related situation rather than merely apply a fixed sentence to all crimes in the same category.
To recapitulate, the writer appose the idea of applying a fixed punishment for each type of crime regardless of the specific circumstance of each crime. However, the writer prefers the latter approach of judging wrongdoers according to the actual commitment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 357, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...l discuss the two views and express the writers opinion on this issue. The suggestio...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, however, if, regarding, so, therefore, whereas, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.3376753507 276% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1522.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43571428571 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01353240418 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514285714286 0.561755894193 92% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2236513662 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.714285714 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303574510794 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101965723863 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0859692308816 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188830694755 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341992714306 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => It means the essay is relatively harder to read.
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.