In some countries, governments are encouraging industries and businesses to move to regional areas outside big cities.
Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages?
In this day and age, numerous industries and business are supposed to locate their facilities far away from metropolises. Nonetheless, there are concerns about whether this belief provides benefits or drawbacks for social life. This essay will look at both sides and try to draw some conclusions.
There are a couple of reasons why the government should persuade industries and business to move out of big cities. One of the main positives of this view is that a large portion of industrial polluted air will be possibly cut off. Obviously, if many faculties were placed in the countryside, the cities could reduce much poison and toxin which caused by the wasted air of those faculties. Secondly, this idea can lead to boosting the economic impact on rural areas. The residents in the countryside will have more chance to opt for their career than they used to. In addition, retailer stores and shops are able to improve their sales figures.
Turning to the other side of the argument, the time for traveling to work is a big problem. In many cases, people who have lived in metropolises must commute such a long way to arrive where they work on a daily basis. This seems to be quite frustrating and also can have an effect on the productivity of the worker. Moreover, it is likely to impact on investments of businesses and industries. As a result, they might have to invest much more capital in means of public transports for their employee.
In conclusion, before adopting any regulations about this debation, the government need to weigh up the advantages, as well as the disadvantages. Personally, I believe the benefits in terms of people’s health protection from air pollution outweigh any negatives.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 646, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re able to improve their sales figures. Turning to the other side of the argumen...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, moreover, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, well, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1436.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96885813149 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82669525347 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636678200692 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.234450556 49.4020404114 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.75 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0625 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3125 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164795676164 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0505754789403 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623012218711 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0923863388057 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372152031548 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.