Nowadays, there are a myriad and more people who are getting health risks because of consuming numerous unwholesome food like fast food. As a result, it is vital that the policy makers have to charge the tax on this unhealthy food. With this standpoint, i differ with the second opinion and believe that higher tax will have more drawbacks than the advantages.
On the one hand, taxing on fast food actually has some indisputable helpful benefits. The reason is that when the hamburgers, chickens and sandwiches have a higher price than usual, people will obviously hardly purchase and eat those which leads to people will have a greater health status. Secondly, forcing higher money on this type of food will support the economy of the country. For instance, if the people eat fast food, they will have pay to the sellers which means give the money indirectly to the government. As a result, charging the tax of the this unwholesome food could improve the health of the people and also develop the country.
On the other hand, this is a terrible idea for a lot of people. Firstly, they need to eat fast food as a way to celebrate of have fun in someday like the weekends, their birthday or the promotion and so on. Furthermore, certain people are really busy because of their work which means they need fast food to eat. As a consequence , people will not have anything to eat or something to celebrate. Consequently, this could create some tension between civilians and policy makers.
In conclusion, taxing on fast food is a good way to minimize people who are having health problems like diabetes. However, this is not the best way to reduce this problem and the disadvantages will always outweigh the advantages
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 255, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...s unhealthy food. With this standpoint, i differ with the second opinion and beli...
^
Line 3, column 552, Rule ID: DT_DT[2]
Message: Maybe you need to remove the second determiner so that only 'the' or 'this' is left.
Suggestion: the; this
...nment. As a result, charging the tax of the this unwholesome food could improve the heal...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 330, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... need fast food to eat. As a consequence , people will not have anything to eat or...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, really, second, secondly, so, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1428.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80808080808 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54860414558 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498316498316 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.2735463828 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7333333333 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290211504357 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115853792006 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473571960113 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197606119831 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300590727183 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.