Obesity, diabetes, and hart diseases are just some of the conditions that can be linked to the consumption of unhealthy food. The solution some propose is taxing these types of food, and therefore steering people away from it. I do not think that this measure would be particularly effective, and in this essay I will explain my position.
Firstly, when discussing this issue, it is crucial to take in consideration other possible factors besides fast food, which have a negative health effects. A sedentary lifestyle is dominant in the nations that are struck the most with illnesses related to weigh issues. This way of life includes insufficient physical activity, increasing risk of health problems even with the well-balanced diet. Although it may seem like the fast food tax could mitigate health problems in such nations, this measure would not address the core reason why vast numbers of people knowingly deteriorate their health by consuming unhealthy food.
This leads to socio-economic aspects of junk food consumption. Statistics show that lower-income people are disproportionately more likely to suffer from obesity and related diseases than their wealthier counterparts. The simple reason behind this are relatively low prices of unhealthy food items. Carbonated sugary drinks and sweets are among the cheapest foods available, and eating at McDonalds is far less expensive than treating yourself with a lunch at a sushi restaurant. The cost of eating healthy is too high for many families, even if they have the time to cook their own meals. Unlike food items rich in carbohydrates or fats, healthy options like raw fruit and vegetables, or grass-feed meat animal products, are rather costly. Therefore, taxing junk food would in reality be a tax on the poor.
In conclusion, I would like to add that taxing just certain food products, like sodas for example, could be beneficial, because these are not staple items. However, taxing fast food comprehensively would harm many struggling families, who are resorting to this diet not because they are irresponsible, but because they cannot afford anything better.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 47, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...y, diabetes, and hart diseases are just some of the conditions that can be linked to the co...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, as for, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1799.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30678466077 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87810686031 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604719764012 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5105324614 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.4375 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1875 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4375 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288161331149 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0911764525913 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491540143319 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170404179166 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377515166455 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.