In some countries, only few young people go to classical music concerts or or play classical music. Why? Should young people be encouraged to attend and learn more?
It is irrefutable that merely a tiny amount of youngsters these days still have an interest in classical music through participating in concerts or mastering instruments related to this unique kind of musicality. From my perspective, this worrisome phenomenon originated from several causes and it is obvious that young people should be a guest and accomplish more knowledge about classical music
To initiate, there is a variety of explanations for the nonchalant attitude towards classical music among youngsters. One fundamental justification is due to the domination of modern music. It does not seem unreasonable to suggest that sound and melody from popular or pop music is much more catchy and addictive when compared to their classic counterparts. Therefore, it is an understandable fact that young people draw more attention and are more allured by pop music. Another reason which is worth considering is the generation gap. There seems to be evidence that external factors such as era or lifestyle may make a profound contribution to the acoustic tendency of humankind. By the way of exemplifying, young people living in a hustle and bustle society often refrain from listening to slow tempo classical music since they have no feeling for it.
Despite these aforementioned reasons, it is still extremely necessary for the juvenile to attend and to learn more about classical music. First and foremost, it can be a great means of broadening their horizon. Examining chamber music not only offer youngsters the opportunities to attain prestigious information about music in different segments of the history but also the knowledge about human civilizations and cultures as well since music has also been an integral part of human's communities from the dawn of time. An illustration of this is that several historical events have successfully adapted into classical music plays. The series of opera works based on the legend and myth of King Arthurs can be a suitable case in point
In conclusion, merely a small quantities of young people rushing for classical music is due to the domination of modern songs and the difference between generations. However, the youngster should be encouraged to attend and learn since it can be helpful to broaden their mind and accomplish knowledge
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 284, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...isome phenomenon originated from several causes and it is obvious that young peop...
^^
Line 1, column 398, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ish more knowledge about classical music To initiate, there is a variety of expla...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 653, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[3]
Message: You should probably use 'work'.
Suggestion: work
...ssical music plays. The series of opera works based on the legend and myth of King Ar...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 735, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Arthurs can be a suitable case in point In conclusion, merely a small quantities...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 31, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'quantity'?
Suggestion: quantity
...point In conclusion, merely a small quantities of young people rushing for classical m...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 301, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aden their mind and accomplish knowledge
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, well, in conclusion, kind of, such as, by the way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1937.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27792915531 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0139762594 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555858310627 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 618.3 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.9754107619 49.4020404114 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.357142857 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2142857143 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64285714286 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.411787137402 0.244688304435 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132027268182 0.084324248473 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0820752797678 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.264282572552 0.151304729494 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036227950887 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.