In some countries, owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people.
Why might this be the case?
Do you think this is a positive or negative situation?
Renting a house has always been counted as an alternative way to get oneself a shelter rather than getting a house ownership. Yet many people in many countries are still striving to buy a house for themselves. There are many reasons to this case and to my knowledge, this is a negative situation rather than a positive one.
There are many ways to explain why people would rather getting oneself a house ownership than renting a house. One of the reasons is that they would like for a permanent and non-limited use of the house. Since they have bought the house, they will be free to use, to live, to rebuild or to sell the house in any ways that suit the laws. However, it cannot be done without an acceptation of the actual owner of the house if they are just renting them. In other terms, when they rent the house, it’s still the “actual owner” house, not their house. Another reason for this is the cost for houses is rising in many countries. If they didn’t buy now, they wouldn’t be able to afford it in the future. And when they got a house, they were guaranteed to have a shelter permanently.
However, despite the given benefits and importance, this is a negative situation. Due to the great number of people’s need for buying a house, it will push the cost to be higher and higher. Many people then couldn’t afford to buy a house or even rent one in account of the high cost. Moreover, because the population is rising, there are great chances that people in the next generation wouldn’t be able to buy or rent houses if people keep claim the existing ones.
In conclusion, there are many ways to explain this case. However, it is a negative situation due to its negative impacts to the near and far future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 56, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'get'
Suggestion: get
...ways to explain why people would rather getting oneself a house ownership than renting ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, still, then, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1424.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.52063492063 5.12529762239 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43567588295 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.460317460317 0.561755894193 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.1178931813 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.7647058824 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5294117647 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11764705882 7.06120827912 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255541014483 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0979288582913 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.085926184968 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184148120359 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0612468961505 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.0946893788 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 50.2224549098 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.3001002004 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 12.4159519038 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.89 8.58950901804 80% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 78.4519038076 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.