In some countries people spend long hours at work. Why does this happen? Is it positive or negative development?
By all accounts, both white and blue-collar employees in several countries tend to extend their working hours at the workplace. This essay will examine the potential causes of this issue and shed light on the reasons why this trend might exert negative impacts on workers.
Low labour productivity and financial purposes are attributed to the described problem. First and foremost, what motivates employees to overwork is to earn supplement income to afford their essential needs. This is because labour workforces in low-income developing countries have to face soaring goods prices yearly; meanwhile, their salary remains static. As a result, those workers have to work overtime for the sake of increasing their income to pay for these unexpected increase in prices. Additionally, low labour productivity also results in extra work hours among employees. In other words, workers whose productivity at work is under the company’s standard tend to work overtime to meet a daily target assigned by a line manager.
It is plausible that working hours extension might bring about a plethora of detrimental impacts on workers. One of the most irrefutable adverse effects is to put them at high risks of pressure. This is because lack of relaxation stemming from long hours at work might result in shortening their sleeping time, which, in turn, might deteriorate insomnia among workers and therefore might cause severe stress. In tandem with this, what working overtime might result in is the breakdown of a relationship. To be more specific, it is likely that workers who are in a relationship will spend less time with their partner, which might result in a conflict at times and therefore might lead to a breakup.
In conclusion, the tendency to overwork has become increasingly prevalent in society in light of low labour productivity and financial purposes. From my perspective, this trend will trigger grave consequences for workers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-13 | vidung | 61 | view |
| 2023-11-27 | phamkhuyen | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-20 | thaokim2003 | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-27 | Fila | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-11 | Sushmabenarji | 73 | view |
- Governments should ban dangerous sports Others think that people should have the freedom to do any sport activity Discuss both sides and give your opinion 78
- Some people want governments to spend money looking for life on other planets Others however think this is a waste of public money when there are so many problems on earth Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- In many countries today if people want to find work they have to move away from their families and friends Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Many people think modern communication technology is having some negative effects on social relationships Do you agree or disagree 75
- People are living longer after they retire What are the problems What can be done to solve the problems 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 30, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'hours'' or 'hour's'?
Suggestion: hours'; hour's
... manager. It is plausible that working hours extension might bring about a plethora ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, in short, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1634.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28802588997 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84995145038 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566343042071 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2037413181 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.933333333 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21831932232 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0700124862589 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500941354572 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128904717287 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0727404662678 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.