Some countries spend a lot of money to make bicycle usage easier.
Why is this?
Is this the best solution to traffic congestion?
It is thought by some that a few countries contribute tremendous amount of money to help people to use bicycles easier. While the governments encourage citizens to use bicycles as it is beneficial for situation on roads and human’s health, there are other ways to tackle high volume of traffic problems.
The governments motivate people to use bicycles instead of cars as there are more and more cars on the roads due to overpopulation in urban areas. Moreover, bicycle is the cheapest means of transportation in urban areas and it is beneficial for people’s health and for the environment. For example, nowadays people have very heavy work load and as a result they do not have time to physical activities. Consequently, when people drive bicycles it can help them to keep physical activities and have good health. Another point to consider is that it is the fastest was to get to any destinations around the crowded city or town.
Another possible solution to tackle this problem is to improve existence public transport system and build railways for high-speed trains. For instance, additional routs of public buses in rush hours would be beneficial to the public. In other words people will choose to get to their destinations by bus as it is convenient and cheap means of transportation. In addition, construction of railways for high-speed train will give opportunity to travel for long distances in a short time.
In conclusion, although bicycle is a health means of transportation and can solve traffic congestion problem, additional routes of buses and high-speed trains would be additional solution to this problem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 568, Rule ID: EASIEST_WAS_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'way'?
Suggestion: way
...t to consider is that it is the fastest was to get to any destinations around the c...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...l for long distances in a short time. In conclusion, although bicycle is a healt...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, moreover, so, while, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1374.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14606741573 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0473176939 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543071161049 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.7773139756 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.5 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.75 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137914456127 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0504923082547 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649423817327 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10030799495 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0616414605549 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.