The graph below shows the percentage of urban/suburban and rural households in a European country that had Internet access between 1994 and 2004.
The bar graph compares the proportion of households from rural and urban/suburban areas who had access to the internet over the 5 consecutive years from 1999 to 2004 in a European country.
Overall, it can be seen that percentage of urban/suburban households who had access to the internet was higher than households from rural areas over the period and that the percentage rose for both areas.
In 1999, approximately 15% of households in urban/suburban areas had access to the internet and a mere 2% of people from villages had access, then the percentage for urban/suburban doubled in 2000 while for rural areas it rose by 2%. In 2001 the percentage in both areas rose and it constituted 40% for urban/suburban and about 10% for rural areas, it was the highest inequality over the period.
The figure for urban/suburban areas went up 15% for the next 4 years and comprised of 55% in 2004 while the percentage for rural areas rose significantly from 10% to 35% at the same period.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 825.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88165680473 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0664820575 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 76.0 106.607317073 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.449704142012 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 23.5202040807 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 165.0 112.824112599 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.8 22.9334400587 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348487033035 0.215688989381 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.242491228643 0.103423049105 234% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100462757599 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262805254026 0.15604864568 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.085840663433 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 13.2329268293 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.62 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.