The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled tea and pineapples in 2010 and 2015 in five European countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two line graphs illustrate sales data for Fairtrade-labelled tea and pineapples in five European countries in two different years in 2010 and 2015, all measures in millions of euros.
Overall, it can be seen that tea sales figures increased in all countries while Pieapples sales increased only in Austria, France and Neherlands and it worth to noting that Austria and France experienced the most significant changes.
Tea sales in France and Austria constituted 2.5 and 4 respectively in 2010 then for the next 5 years sales in France raised for approximately 8 times while Austria’s sales raised just for 2 times. Between 2010 and 2015 sales of tea in Germany and Norway went up by 0.2 to 3 and 2 respectively. Netherland’s sales stood at 2 in 2010 and finished period at 2.7.
With regards to Pieapples, Austria saw the most significant increase in the sales stood at 16 in 2010 to finish period at 48 in 2015. Sales figures in France and Netherlands rose approximately 3 times between 2010 and 2015 and constituted 6.5 and 5 respectively in 2015. On the other hand sales figures in Norway decreased steadily from 2.8 to 2 and Germany also experienced moderate fall from 3 to 1.9.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 248, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 2010 and 2015 and constituted 6.5 and 5 respectively in 2015. On the other hand ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 6.8 235% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 998.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86829268293 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11645858287 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492682926829 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.3872228716 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.571428571 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.2857142857 22.9334400587 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181963669766 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100691281055 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577195889232 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12696084029 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0570206532261 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.56 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.