The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled tea and pineapples in 2010 and 2015 in five European countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given tables represent the turnover in millions of euros from sales of Fairtrade-labeled tea and pineapples in five countries of Europe in the years 2010 and 2015.
Overall, Austria was the nation having the highest number of sales of both tea and pineapples in 2010, while Norway and France had the lowest sales of tea and pineapples respectively. It can be seen that most countries saw a significant increase in sales of these two goods in the next five years, except Norway and Germany which declined.
The first table shows that the market for Fairtrade-labelled tea in five countries saw a dramatic increase in 2015 than that of 5 years ago. In particular, In two places sales increased by the same small amount: 2.8 – 3 million euros in Germany and 1.8 - 2 million euros in Norway. Meanwhile, the increment was slightly larger in Netherlands, from 2 to 2.7 million euros. In 2015, the sales figure in Austria doubled from 4 to 8 million euros. Finally, in France, there was an enormous increase, from 2.5 – 21 million euros.
Look at the second table, it was also Austria which had by far more sales of pineapples than the other four countries. The sale figures for Austria tripled, from 16 to 48 million euros, while in France and Netherlands sales only grew from 2 – 6.5 and from 1.6 – 5 million euros respectively. By contrast, Norway and Germany showed a different pattern which was recorded drops in pineapple sales from 2.8 to 2 and 3 to 1.9 million euros in 2015.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 254, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...8 – 3 million euros in Germany and 1.8 - 2 million euros in Norway. Meanwhile, th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, if, look, second, so, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1239.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 261.0 196.424390244 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74712643678 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87922143796 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505747126437 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 349.2 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.7099721883 43.030603864 171% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.9 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172063989636 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0852300164131 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0779070518968 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145652732079 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0687132009044 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.