In many countries, most youngsters are inspired to take an year off, to work or travel before attending university courses. This tendency, also called “gap year”, has both benefits and drawbacks, which will be discussed in this essay.
Spending a year for jobs or journeys would fairly be beneficial. First, taking a gap year should furnish students opportunities to discover their career interest. Given that taking an appropriate occupation would indubitably be a prevalent intention for most people subsequent to the laborious study path, individuals should realize their profession potential in order to develop, without difficultly, the career in the future. Additionally, deferring a year before embarking on the formal university education would give students a chance to socialize, engage in volunteering, and understand global issues and global culture. These positive opportunities would moderately enlarge students’ competence and interrelationships which could support them in the long term. For example, my friend, Suzy, who took a gap year to explore the word and volunteer her services for relief work; thanks to this year, she actually made a great amount of high-quality relationships which have reinforced her career greatly.
Moreover, besides advantages, the break of a year taken before pursuing university studies would bring out students some negative influences. Primarily, gap year, occasionally, is so relaxing and enjoyable that students could renounce further studies. The present essay draws on the word of psychologist Wendy, whose supposition is that comforting and entertaining for a long time should decrease people’s motivation in learning, this lessening could urge students to ignore their studies permanently. Furthermore, considering that spending one year out of studying means that students could waste the precious acquiring knowledge time, this would surely interrupt learning process. Consequently, students could slip out their studying route, hence, their accomplishment could lessen. For instance, my brother, who decided to spend a year to travel and explore the world before attending university education, disavowed his college itinerary everlastingly given his immersing in relaxing.
In conclusion, the trend called “gap year” have both cons and pros, thereby, people should consider carefully before making a decision of this.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In many countries, most youngsters are i...
^^
Line 1, column 59, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...s, most youngsters are inspired to take an year off, to work or travel before atte...
^^
Line 2, column 266, Rule ID: SUBSEQUENT_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'after'
Suggestion: after
...e a prevalent intention for most people subsequent to the laborious study path, individuals s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 676, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to process'
Suggestion: to process
...e, this would surely interrupt learning process. Consequently, students could slip out ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 943, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ucation, disavowed his college itinerary everlastingly given his immersing in rel...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2046.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.84571428571 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06268656241 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605714285714 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 612.9 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2615295861 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.4 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.26666666667 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231462446714 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0785681101327 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457156535252 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141599309135 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300560299779 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.95 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.1 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.