It is a widespread belief among some cultures that children are taught that everything is achievable if they put efforts on it. This essay will suggest that trying hard may benefit children from practical point of view and undesirable outcomes are the primary disadvantage.
Some elderly people or parents usually encourage youngsters to do their best in order to achieve the desired results. The reason behind this suggestion is that these efforts will definitely provide children with practical skills which may advantage them later in life. In other words, the acquired practical knowledge can be implemented in future career or study pursuits by these children. For example, teachers mostly motivate students to study hard in order to achieve best results in exams or to have a bright career in the future. Therefore, such urge and motivation given to children may be advantageous for their practical life ahead.
Despite this advantage, there are some drawbacks that are sometimes ignored. That means that the outcomes of the toil may not always be positive, and children may encounter a failure at the end. Consequently, this failure, instead of inspiring young people, will make them disillusioned and demotivated leading to the sense of unwillingness to try again. For instance, various competitions have the sole goal which is to choose the winner, and all the other participating children will manifestly be disappointed after trying hard enough to triumph except for the only winner. Thus, convincing children that they can attain anything if they try hard enough may adversely lead to despair when the final results are undesirable.
In conclusion, some cultures teach children to put many efforts for the attainment of any aim. Although this phenomenon can actually progress these children’s practical knowledge, the consequences of potential negative outcomes should not be overlooked.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, consequently, if, look, may, so, therefore, thus, except for, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1609.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39932885906 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86359606513 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580536912752 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9823633729 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.928571429 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2857142857 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348123350759 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119598936894 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.077257854743 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222343955473 0.151304729494 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568789269464 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.