Apart from bureaucratic strategies, market goals and environment initiatives, education has been the topic of interest for many country leaders due to its paramount importance to the nation's future. In some countries, secondary students are purposefully directed toward specific subjects while in other parts of the world, the doors are left wide open for students to choose their own paths. Each of these systems has pros and cons, which will be discussed in the followings.
To begin with, sole emphasis on a subset of subjects would mean that the government's education budget could be effectively invested on perfecting the curriculums, teaching methodologies and the essential facilities, which, in return, helps to save a lot of resources. On top of that, the more time the students getting exposed or learning the subject, the better and skillful they become at it. This does not only ensure the source of skilled labors for certain key industries but also foster the development of those fields.
On the other side, people in nowadays take high regard on individualism that focus on the self-discovering of each personal so that they can bloom with their full potential. A prime example of this would be the US's education system as children have career orientation classes that help to introduce them to a variety of profession, such as cooking and drawing, in early stages of primary and secondary school. As a result, students become more self-aware of their own capabilities by trying different fields, which helps them to be more versatile and resilient in an ever-changing world. Besides, the teachers are also more likely to discover the gifted one in unpopular field like sports and arts that they can focus on nurturing and foster those talents.
In short, I believe that in the world where more and more occupations are being taken over by robots, a holistic education system that emphasize discovering and foster personal creativity would be a better edge in the long run.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 74, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
... subset of subjects would mean that the governments education budget could be effectively i...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 27, Rule ID: IN_NOWADAYS[1]
Message: nowadays is used without 'in'. Use simply: 'nowadays'.
Suggestion: nowadays
...hose fields. On the other side, people in nowadays take high regard on individualism that ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, second, so, while, apart from, in short, such as, as a result, to begin with, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1667.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11349693252 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84143970423 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610429447853 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.7189631513 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.545454545 106.682146367 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6363636364 20.7667163134 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5454545455 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245749111982 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0854542951586 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050365031092 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141688730462 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420707648512 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 50.2224549098 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.95 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.