On the one hand ,such a contribution to the health and effectiveness of workers can be underestimated , at least because of the money spent on the job training or day release programmers. Instead it could be spent on something more important . For example :on pay increment , financial rewards , bonuses or incentives which can have a greater impact on the performance and heath of employees. On the other hand , ongoing training can be beneficial. First of all, because of the heath improvement, workers can be fitter and less stressed . This means that ,the level of output and service will be higher. Moreover , life balance of the staff will hopefully improved. For instance , if they do not feel any health problems ,it may lead to better job satisfaction which is itself motivational factor.
Overall ,while heath – related subsidies are very attractive , over-focusing on these programs can be harmful. Money spent moderately on the ongoing training can be beneficial for the company.
- Some people say that it is possible to tell a lot about a person s culture and character from their choice To what extent you agree or disagree 70
- Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction Do you agree or disagree Provide relevant examples if necessary 84
- Some employers offer their employees subsidised membership of gyms and sports clubs believing that this will make their staff healthier and thus more effective at work Other employers see no benefit in doing so Consider the arguments from both aspects of 50
- Some people think that it is a waste of time for high school students to study literature such as novels and poems To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- nowadays many people aim to create a balance between their work and other aspects of their life however only a few achieve it What are the problems in doing this and what solutions can you suggest 84