Some people say that the best way for children to learn to read is by using online materials. Others say that printed materials should be used. Discuss both views and give your opinion
People have different views about the best source of learning that can teach children how to read effectively. While some people think that the best reliable source of learning is online resources, I believe that nothing can replace printed materials.
On the one hand, as people claim, online materials have their own advantage like convenience. In other words, parents with the click of the button may download high rated book or application with engrossing content which will glue children’s eyes to the screen of the gadgets, as a result, they will learn more with a great relish. As an example, it was estimated that 80% of couples prefer purchasing online materials for their kids to enhance their reading skills.
On the flip side, reading paper books is more effective compared to the online method of reading. First of all, students who use them unconsciously store the data in their mind due to the fact that experience of reading the real book is highly correlated with better imagination. To make it clearly, children by touching the book and highlighting the sentences will be more concentrated, hence if they can imagine it, they are able to remember the new information. For example, scientists claim that those who read real book will be able to comprehend the information better and retain it longer.
Secondly, using printed materials enjoyable too. Due to the note-taking empty spaces in the end of the book students take a delight in reading. In addition, the convenience of underlining the certain necessary sentence makes reading more interesting and exciting, consequently, children will be engrossed in reading. For instance, it was proven that bookworms prefer reading and choosing paper books even for their children, because it is more interesting.
In conclusion, it is important to teach children how to read, no matter how by using printed materials or online sources. However, in my view printed version of books, magazines, newspapers are more useful.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 388, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to paper'
Suggestion: to paper
...t bookworms prefer reading and choosing paper books even for their children, because ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, in my view, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1669.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16718266254 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79207535801 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557275541796 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4870830327 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.266666667 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5333333333 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5333333333 7.06120827912 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280696382121 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101602171767 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065733082381 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165914129969 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0426926370921 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.