Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
Traditionally, children have studied foreign languages at later stages in educational careers, but some believe it could be beneficial to introduce foreign language earlier. While both advantages and disadvantages associated with this topic, the positive aspects take precedence over the drawbacks.
Young children are better able to learn languages for a variety of factors. First off, students show that young children pick up languages better than teenagers. The younger brains are, the more they are able to retain information in the long-term. It has also been proven that young brains absorb material at a faster rate. Addiontally, implementing language lessons in primary schools would allow fir more flexibility within the school system. Younger children will be able to engage with the material more frequently through shorter sessions, thus maintaining their enthusiasm and progress.
However, there are some disadvantages when it comes to learning languages at an earlier age. Primary teachers school teachers may not be qualified to provide lessons in foreign languages, resulting in inadequate experience in language learning. Further, school districts may not be able to carry on foreign language teaching from primary to secondary schools. In this case, students would not only lose their progress, but they would also be demotivated due to the lack of consistency througout their educational careers.Despite this, these issues can be effectively addressed through consistent support in the school district, and pose only a minor threat to the advantages.
Although there are a few disadvantages regarding the study of a foreign language during primary school, there are a plethora of advantages that outweigh the negative aspects. Young children’s innate abilities should be appreciated and fostered to their full advantage.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 522, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Despite
...ncy througout their educational careers.Despite this, these issues can be effectively a...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, regarding, second, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1578.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.71739130435 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97290501887 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594202898551 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.8331609354 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.714285714 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7142857143 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.381074738426 0.244688304435 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127475846043 0.084324248473 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0833179318576 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223121576001 0.151304729494 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.011157155184 0.056905535591 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.