In some large cities, people have to pay a fee when they drive their cars into the city centre, in a policy to reduce the number of cars in the city.
Give reasons in support of and opposing this traffic congestion policy, and give your own opinion.
It is true that, some countries have an obligation to reduce the traffic congestion in the city center by the rule of fee payment for each drive. However, in this essay explain about the importance of statement and depicts some opposing point of view. Such as, in general, such law would be beneficial in the environment and have sort of dilemma to the public in some extent.
To begin with, the merits of traffic payees that, firstly, such action may insist the public to reduce the usage of car unnecessarily, and tend to use for the emergency purpose only. In fact other than the tourists, or officials, make use of car for the daily needs and office going which would be declined by the law and may be give priority to the public transport . This would be advantageous for the department of road and transport.Secondly, owing to the fact that, not only to the traffic but also for the surroundings may be free from congestion and pollution respectively. Declining statics of vehicles would helps the pedestrians to walk freely, and tumble the impacts of over crowding city centers hustle and bustle to some extent. At once, payment may lead to the less usage of cars may mitigate the fossil fuel consumption and would be free from environmental pollution to the core.
However, there are some sort of detrimental effects to oppose like, less service to the city centers may affect the travelers, tourists, and daily passengers like employees, students and ordinary people. In other words, extra payment for car might be burden for the people who used car as a transport for the up and down trips. Similarly, owing to the fact that, visitors who is interested to check in city centers might be double think about the visit and which may affect the national income to some extent. To illustrates, people may try to find out alternative passage way to the centers which is non payee and traffic congestion would not be fell down vividly.
To conclude, controversial issue of road payee for the car often helpful for the nature and people in same manner. Notwithstanding like any other matter, such rules also had some kind of dilemma to the public in terms of expenditure and inconvenience.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 367, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...be give priority to the public transport . This would be advantageous for the depa...
^^
Line 3, column 438, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Secondly
...or the department of road and transport.Secondly, owing to the fact that, not only to th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 618, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'help'
Suggestion: help
...ly. Declining statics of vehicles would helps the pedestrians to walk freely, and tum...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 25, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'sorts'?
Suggestion: sorts
...o the core. However, there are some sort of detrimental effects to oppose like, ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 290, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'transport'.
Suggestion: transport
...e burden for the people who used car as a transport for the up and down trips. Similarly, o...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, may, second, secondly, similarly, so, in fact, in general, kind of, sort of, such as, in other words, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1822.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 378.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82010582011 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73448449916 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489417989418 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 563.4 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 32.1461109464 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.142857143 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6428571429 7.06120827912 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166980272744 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0674444339533 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0414592347844 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116169596548 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437126600673 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 50.2224549098 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.