In some large cities, people have to pay a fee when they drive their cars into the city Centre, in a policy to reduce the number of cars in the city.Give reason in support of and opposing the policy, and give your own opinion.

Essay topics:

In some large cities, people have to pay a fee when they drive their cars into the city Centre, in a policy to reduce the number of cars in the city.

Give reason in support of and opposing the policy, and give your own opinion.

Traffic congestion is a major problem in metropolitan cities throughout the world. Owing to the fact, a policy which obligates citizens pay a fee when they use cars is introduced with the intention of reducing a number of private vehicles on the road. While it is a good method to cope with the problem, I have taken up against the perception inasmuch as overloaded cars on the road are a crucial problem which requires integrated solutions so as to flattening the number of vehicles.

Encouraging people using cars to pay retribution is an innovative idea to reduce numerous cars on the road. This is because the citizens will think twice when they want to travel by driving their private automobiles. As an obvious example, Electronic Road Pricing (ERP System) has implemented on several congested roads in Jakarta. The purpose of the system is to reduce the amount of traffic jam which is caused by the burst of cars on the road. Consequently, there has a gradual fall in a number of cars in Jakarta since the policy has implemented. Nevertheless, the solution does no longer exist in that the well-off people in the city can use their own cars by paying a fee regardless of the risk.

Apparently, government needs a policy which consists of integrated solutions to reduce a number of cars. It can be argued that a council should cope with several ideas which are connected each other. Take a London as an example; the council in the city improve public transportation to be more comfortable while ERP is also implemented in the metropolis. Moreover, the government raise a higher tax for car owners from £100 per a car in 2013 to £1,200 in this year. Furthermore, 69 % of roads is overtaken by pedestrians. The actions are implemented and connected each other at the same time as a fee is required for car drivers.

In conclusion, while paying a fee for people who want to use private cars is a good policy to drop a total of automobiles on the road, I would argue integrated methods are needed to solve the problem of overloaded cars on the road. It is imperative that city councils should come up with brilliant idea to flatten numerous cars on the street.

Votes
Average: 6 (1 vote)

Comments

Electronic Road Pricing (ERP System) has implemented on several congested roads
Electronic Road Pricing (ERP System) has been implemented on several congested roads

since the policy has implemented.
since the policy was implemented.
since the policy has been implemented.

the solution does no longer exist in that the well-off people
Description: make sure you used 'in that' correctly

which are connected each other.
which are connecting each other.
which are connected to each other.

the council in the city improve public transportation
the council in the city improves public transportation

the government raise a higher tax
the government raises a higher tax

69 % of roads is overtaken by pedestrians
69 % of roads are overtaken by pedestrians

paying a fee for people who want to use private cars
paying a fee by people who want to use private cars

should come up with brilliant idea to flatten numerous cars on the street.
should come up with brilliant ideas to flat numerous cars on the streets.

flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 9 2

Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 5.5 out of 9
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 9 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 2 2
No. of Sentences: 17 15
No. of Words: 379 350
No. of Characters: 1747 1500
No. of Different Words: 181 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.412 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.609 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.742 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 121 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 88 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 58 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 43 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.294 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.151 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.471 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.33 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.51 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.053 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5