Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly. Others value quality of work above appearance.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Some companies think it is much important to wear their employees in a smart way while, others concern more on the quality of work. From my perspective, I think the both factors are important, however the latter one having more benefits to an organization.
It is evident, when the workforce being smart gives spectacular results for the company image. Undoubtedly this enhance the personality of the staff and derive more recognition. At the oppose side, if the employees not dress in professional way may impact in detrimental way for the company recognition. However, the employee’s clothes are not much effect at the organization, this is the most concern thing for outsiders to get an idea about the company. For instance, the recent research done at Colombo university reveals employee’s smart dresses cause for make the organization popular among others.
The quality of work is the main factor towards the success of the company. If the company does not have the employees with smart clothes, although they work hard that can be expect the growth in efficiency which ultimately reach the economical growth for the work place. In addition, the company with hard workers has more benefits for the company instead of their appearance . The employees with beautiful costumes just give a pleasant feeling for others whereas the quality of work gives long term advantages of production growth, high salaries, other benefits like incentives and bonus ultimately more stable in financially.
To conclude, quality of work is more valuable compare to the employee’s appearance to a company. I believe, I has more benefits receive to the employees of more income for their work and assure the company stability.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 67, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a smart way" with adverb for "smart"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... much important to wear their employees in a smart way while, others concern more on the quali...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 182, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...e staff and derive more recognition. At the oppose side, if the employees not dress in pro...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 234, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...n efficiency which ultimately reach the economical growth for the work place. In addition,...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 376, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... the company instead of their appearance . The employees with beautiful costumes j...
^^
Line 13, column 116, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[1]
Message: The pronoun 'I' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
...s appearance to a company. I believe, I has more benefits receive to the employees ...
^^^
Line 13, column 158, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s more benefits receive to the employees of more income for their work and assure...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, whereas, while, for instance, i think, in addition, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28519855596 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94120789767 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541516245487 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2711330257 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.615384615 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3076923077 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23076923077 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172045766592 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0713186612549 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053012317042 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120736189888 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0337433355266 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.