In contemporary times, maintaining a dress code is not mandatory in many organizations rather they believe in the quality of the work. On the other hand, some have the dissenting idea that for bringing professionalism among the employees and for the face value of the company, smart dressing plays a vital role. In the following paragraphs, both views will be discussed and finally, my opinion will be given.
To begin with, a friendly environment is important for increasing the productivity of the company. A similar dress-up in the office has a sign of indiscrimination between the workers, therefore, it will help them to boost up their confidence and increase their performance. Moreover, upgrading the brand value of the company employees' appearance plays an important role. For example, most multinational companies have to interact with foreign clients, therefore, in the meeting, smart-looking is significant to ensure the deal. As a consequence, it is beneficial not only for the company but also for the employees in the future.
On the other hand, it is indisputable that without the quality of the work only the appearance can not enhance the brand value, consequently, now the startup companies emphasize more on the standard of the work. For instance, in the software sector when a company CEO or the other members interview a new employee they always think about the skills of the interviewers. In that case, the dress code can not bring prosperity to the organizations, therefore the outlook has changed. Furthermore, choosing to dress as their own makes them more comfortable in the office, as a result, the efficiency of the work and the effectiveness of the workers both will upgrade.
In conclusion, it is clear from the third passage that if companies give freedom in the case of wearing dresses then it will bring more company value than maintaining a dress code. So, I will support the former idea.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, furthermore, if, look, moreover, so, then, therefore, third, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1615.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09463722397 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07476649775 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533123028391 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5308762971 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.357142857 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6428571429 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0 7.06120827912 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223971914777 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0703649616356 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0394874157281 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133775046818 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424921051824 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.