In working place, some employers argue that their personnels should dress smartly so that they can be adaptable for their job while others prioritize work efficiency over clothes. While there are some advantages towards the latter opinion, I believe that dressing well will be a better option.
On the one hand, a few explainations can be given to to those who support the second idea. Firstly, some specific fields need creativity in their daily job by putting on comfortable oufit. For example, employees who work in marketing are mostly not reluctant to put on uniforms so as to think up innovative products in a relaxing environment. Secondly, some companies with a unique culture which require their workers to assist in various roles will not be attentive to dressing.
Once a film-making firm need their office staffs serve in producing movies, they want their employees wear clothes as flexible as possible.
On the other hand, there are many reasons why personnels should dress well to perform their tasks perfectly. In professional environment, people cooperate with each other depending on trust and belief. If a staff does not show proper manner through his clothes, he will be thought for having a clumsy working style. Moreover, dressing well is a key to develop a disciplinary environment in a company. Thanks to preparing their outfit carefully, employees will be more councious about their duties in any duties they take on.
In conclusion, although there are some benefits towards valuing quality at work over the appearance, I believe that it is a better choice to have staffs dress smartly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 51, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: to
... hand, a few explainations can be given to to those who support the second idea. Firs...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 278, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...mostly not reluctant to put on uniforms so as to think up innovative products in a relax...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1355.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13257575758 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7393016502 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.617424242424 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.1772789936 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.230769231 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3076923077 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204115634671 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0707265196706 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504352005137 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11961766257 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494497233175 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.