Some parents buy their children whatever they ask for, and allow their children to do whatever they want. Is this a good way to raise children? What consequences could this style of parenting have for children as they get older?
It is true that some families are spoiling their kids. I do not agree with this method of raising as this will lead to negative outcomes to the children and the society.
I believe that it is important to create a moral frame for the children; this frame should be guarded by some punishments. Form my personal experience during my caring for my oldest son, I found that being permissive to him resulted in major problems. When I allowed him to buy candies he liked, he wasted his money and got sick. On the other side, when I told him that his money should be kept for his sibling and he would be punished in case of disobeying that, I found him totally disciplined. Experts of education recommend giving children a sort of vitamin “N” which is the “NO” word. This vitamin protects both parents and their kids.
There are several drawbacks of this way of raising kids. Selfishness is the most important results. It is obvious that children whose parents allow them to do whatever they like, tend to grow up with a self-centered personality. They do not care to other feelings or needs. These groups of children when they lead a position in a team, they fail, because they lack the concept of team work. Another disastrous outcome is the impulsivity. Children, who got used to receive all what they want, were noticed that they had a criminal tendency. They try to get their desired objects by any means, perhaps they may steal or kill others.
In conclusion, I think parents have to make boundaries for their children to protect themselves, their kids and the whole community.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
may, so, i think, in conclusion, sort of, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 24.0651302605 216% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1324.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74551971326 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65361782149 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591397849462 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 5.43587174349 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.3776203789 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.8823529412 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4117647059 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.05882352941 7.06120827912 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.480221951699 0.244688304435 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129059976382 0.084324248473 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0909203502443 0.0667982634062 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.271031331327 0.151304729494 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100335269191 0.056905535591 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.0946893788 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 50.2224549098 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.3001002004 64% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.