Some parents say that giving expensive gifts to a child can create bad habits in him/her. Do you agree or disagree?
Giving present to the friends, and close family particularly children in special ceremonies such as birthday change to a common event among people around the globe. Some people believe that buying expensive gifts for children can have negative impact on their habits. Personally, I agree with this idea. My reasons for this position mentioned as follows.
This is a proven fact that the individuals personality in adulthood shape in the child period. If parents teach them saving to cost, for example, they learn cost management at future. About the gift also, this subject can influence on their choses in case of purchase goods at the future. If they get highly cost gifts now, as a result, they habit for buying valuable devices when they grew up. therefore, I think this trend may create serious obstacles for their parents or expose, like financial problems.
Secondly, the aim of giving presents to child is creating motivation, encourage, and aspiration them for more effort. However, I think costly gifts not just cannot create more incentive in him/his, but it causes a sense of expectation. For example, I remembered that my father gave me a cheap ball for good mark in school when I was a student. I really excited at that moment, and try to get better score in next year. but nowadays, in spite of that majority of families held immense ceremonies with a valuable presents like tablet, laptop for children, unfortunately they are not satisfied, and like have been more valuable instruments. For this reason, they do not have enough motivation and less effort for more thriving.
To sum up, the buying of valuable presents for children cannot be suitable idea for creating motivate at them, but it rises their expectation, and cause problems for them at future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 32, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...ws. This is a proven fact that the individuals personality in adulthood shape in the c...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 158, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to cost'
Suggestion: to cost
...saving to cost, for example, they learn cost management at future. About the gift al...
^^^^
Line 9, column 420, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...d try to get better score in next year. but nowadays, in spite of that majority of ...
^^^
Line 9, column 568, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...blet, laptop for children, unfortunately they are not satisfied, and like have be...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, i think, such as, as a result, in spite of, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1494.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0303030303 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60374966052 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589225589226 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 0.809619238477 988% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6580322423 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.375 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5625 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132460694275 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0489198062801 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435363921223 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0808678634809 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369505015553 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.