Some peole claim that not enough of the waste from home is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirements.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste.
Recycling domestic waste, nowadays, is becoming important in our lives. It is said that the governments should introduce the new laws to obligate people recycle their housing waste. From my perspectives, there are many sustainable measures being more possible than the governmental obligations.
The recycling laws might be considered as the temporary ways to tackle environmental issues. Furthermore, people might be stress because of those legal requirements. Such the negative thoughts about recycling can be informed when the laws tend to be strict and serious, thereby breaking them totally possibly happens since people think those requirements detrimentally afftect to their freedom.
One of the practical and efficient measures to encourage people recycle is improving their counsciousness. By organizing different environmental activities, people can easily realize the important role of recycling as well as adjust their previous behavior to portect environment through recycling. Besides, the governments should held the field trips for the local communities. For example, people can have an opportunity to visit the recycling factories and be trained how to recycle domestic waste, then, they can pratice and make it a reality at home.
Finally, it is more vital and essential to let people know why recycling is extremely necessary. Were people to recycle their housing waste, it could help to save money because of not buying new daily items. Additionally, it is also regarded as the most effective way to protect the environment when everybody is in a tendency of recycling.
In conclusion, instead of launching the recycling laws, the governments should pay more attention to improve people's awareness in order to make recycling become a daily habit rather than legal obligations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 97, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[2]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: Where; We
...w why recycling is extremely necessary. Were people to recycle their housing waste, ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, finally, furthermore, if, so, then, well, for example, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1527.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57299270073 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.047060599 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591240875912 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8117374087 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.071428571 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5714285714 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78571428571 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292250259512 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102219544383 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482816982781 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166270568915 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0308309075938 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.