Nowadays safety in the roads has become discussable among individuals. Punishment is becoming prevalent method beyond the controller of safety subjects. Number of people believes that punishing methods are not responded. On the other hand, some individuals have converse opinion. In the following essay this kind of controversial issue will be discussed and the merits and demerit of it will be determined.
Firstly, it is undeniable that, punishment is one of the most prominent and common method of management, also it is differed culture to culture. It is definitely is more efficient in developing countries, due to level of civilization. On the other hand, economical penalties for safety in motor ways and roads, cause to increase the incoming money for the government and without any doubt it is reasonable way to diminish number of hazardous crimes in the roads.
Secondly, always there have been groups which are against the others. In developed society broad minded people consider punishing methods for safety in the roads, as most important reasons for anarchy in the public. When you force people to do any kind of activities and did not develop their cultural aspects, ultimately this weakness will reveal it-self in social behavior impacts.
By the way of conclusion, I believe that, although there have been a myriad of weak point for punishment which some of them were mentioned above, but personally in my view, it has been so beneficial to preventing roads crime. Moreover, in the future it will be carried on at least in civilizing societies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 306, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed on at least in civilizing societies.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, at least, kind of, by the way, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1314.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17322834646 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83600142557 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606299212598 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.720637948 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.076923077 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5384615385 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46153846154 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206324514944 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0650779702425 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526531735941 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120146934768 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0172479936468 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.