Some people argue that strict punishment for driving offenses is the only effective way toward improving safety on the road Do you agree or disagree

It is often communicate few masses believe that difficult actions for the driving offenses is the good path towards improving safety on the road. I firmly accord with this said notion owing to they drive slowly and they can gain knowledge about the traffic rules.

To commence with, first and foremost reason is that when strict action apply on the society then they are drive slowly and carefully. To explain it. when they drive the any vehicle slowly then less chances for accidents on the highway. Included, all masses walk on the road freely nad no afraid from the accidents. For example, a survey was conducted by the road health insurance offices found that in 2018 accidents less from the preivious last years. Hence, many lives can save from the mishappened.

Further strengthening the views, also they find out about the traffic rules. To elaborate it, individulas can also known about the traffic rules and they never cross the red light. It is the best way to improving road rules from the hard actions. To epitome, a headline was published in "THE MOSCOW TIMES" newspaper revealed that with the hardest action public do not break the rules on the roads. As a result, they can give the knowledge to their kinders about the roads.

To conculde, with hard actions many pupils can understnad about the traffic rules and they never victim of the accidents.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 91, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fficult actions for the driving offenses is the good path towards improving safet...
^^
Line 3, column 194, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun chances is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... they drive the any vehicle slowly then less chances for accidents on the highway. I...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...lives can save from the mishappened. Further strengthening the views, also they find...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, if, so, then, for example, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1149.0 1615.20841683 71% => OK
No of words: 234.0 315.596192385 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91025641026 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35914854429 2.80592935109 84% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 176.041082164 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57264957265 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 342.0 506.74238477 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.6808698061 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.0714285714 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7142857143 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132841702775 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0486277365449 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0691918113009 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0823538398436 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0663781415436 0.056905535591 117% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.0946893788 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.