The line graph illustrates the information about that the number of annual tourists to Australia by abroad citizen. The table depicts information on the nation of origin where the explorer came from 1975 to 2005.
After analyzing, it can be seen clearly that Australia visitors came to South Korea 2.9 millions and 9.1millions in 1975 and 2005 respectively. In contrast, in Japan increased 0.3 millions in former and 2.9 millions in latter year. Australian visitants came few in China and U.S.A nations. In Britain 0.9 millions in 1975 and 2.9 millions in 2005 came visitants. In last Europe nation 1.1 in former and 4.5 millions in latter year visitors came from Australia.
The line further collates that visitors came in 1975 nearly 10 millions. After 10 years, the number of visitors increased about 5 million. In 1995 explorer almost 25 millions incremented. Last year guests came to Australia rapidly 30 millions and touch the peak level.
Overall, Australian visitors decreased in former year and so many boomed in latter year. The number of expatriates in Australia has increased year by year
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 280, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: A
...ian visitants came few in China and U.S.A nations. In Britain 0.9 millions in 197...
^
Line 3, column 280, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'A nation' or simply 'nations'?
Suggestion: A nation; Nations
...ian visitants came few in China and U.S.A nations. In Britain 0.9 millions in 1975 and 2....
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 929.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13259668508 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67710202421 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502762430939 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.5376175403 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 71.4615384615 112.824112599 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.9230769231 22.9334400587 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.15384615385 5.23603664747 22% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230582470877 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0965830591832 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0762497256644 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167705580899 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114213460952 0.0819641961636 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.2 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 11.88 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.