Some people believe that all wild animals should be protected. Others say that few wild animals should be protected instead. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is a common belief that all wild animals have the right to be protected. On the contrary, some people think only a few wild animals should have this benefit. In my point of view, I totally agree with this opinion due to several reasons.
To start with, all animals are equal in that they have the right to live and have proficient habitats. From one study of the University of Shanghai, China, up to this decade, about 70% of animals’ habitats have been replaced by buildings or houses. Besides that, some houses for species which live in the forests have disappeared because of deforestation and erosion. This means people are not realizing that their living styles are affecting wildlife.
Nevertheless, few wildlife species should benefit from government or community conservation because of their devotion to humans. So that they are usually hunted to take for granted. From my experience, elephants are not only well-known with tourism as one of the most entertaining forms of transportation but also certain animals are looked at by hunters. It can endanger their population so protection of animals is rising nowaday. Furthermore, some species should not be conservated as they are dangerous for residents and other animals’ life. Specifically, snakes or crocodiles may harm and kill people spontaneously. According to a survey from the University of Cincinnati, America shows that 89% of students choose not to take careful protection with dangerous animals.
To sum up, both viewpoints have its merits and demerits. However, I totally disagree with the perspective that all wildlife species should be conservated that I have already been mentioned the causes above.
- The diagram below shows how ethanol fuel is produced from corn
- The diagram below shows how ethanol fuel is produced from corn
- The graph shows the amount of fruit produced in four countries France Spain Germany Turkey from 1970 to 2010
- Some people say that too much time and resources are spent on the protection of wild animals and birds To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people believe that all wild animals should be protected Others say that few wild animals should be protected instead Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 386, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...estation and erosion. This means people are not realizing that their living styles are affecting ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, so, well, on the contrary, to start with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22509225092 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89460287084 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571955719557 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.1601796698 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9375 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289868793337 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0930582980417 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0882140989508 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179806859318 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0993647457171 0.056905535591 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.