Some people believe that children should be banned from using their phones during the school day. Others believe that children should be allowed to use their phones.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
It is argued that children should be restricted to use phones during the lessons. However, other people oppose this idea and suggest that children should get the permission to use phones in the classroom. Personally, children should be permitted to use phones at school for study purpose under the allowance of their teacher only but not for their own sake.
The first reasons for my agreement to the usage of phones for learning requirements is due to the variety of academic knowledge provided by the phone, teachers can allow children to use phones for searching some advanced information to make a presentation. It works with a fast pace and saves more time for other indoor activities as students don't have to spend hours in the library to read loads of books in order to find specific information needed for their projects. Besides, it is the teacher's responsibility to tell pupils the extent of using phones in class. That means teachers are responsible for instructing students to search for appropriate information, not all the things. Moreover, they should have the time set for that activity to make it equal for the marking.
Generally, most teachers approve of getting the support of smartphones for doing research. But they completely disapprove of allowing children to use phones for unacceptable reasons except studying. For example, it can be proved that a small part of students get distracted from the lesson. It makes sense for teachers to punish them as kids go to school to learn, not to play games under any circumstances. If children who are addicted to using phones while the teacher is teaching, that will affect other students for their progress and also make an impact on the performance of unobedient ones on the final test at the end of the semester. It becomes even worse when parents of those stubborn children receive their results and blame the teacher teaching the subject that their child fails to pass in the exam for not dedicated enough to help their child getting good grades as their classmates do. For that, teachers should make a regulation on restriction to the extent of using phones.
In conclusion, it is acceptable for children to use phones for help on their school work but not for their backup explanation when being caught red-handed. Additionally, teachers play a crucial role in controlling the use of phones of students and that's the reason why they have to make it look right on their rules in class for using phones.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 343, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...for other indoor activities as students dont have to spend hours in the library to r...
^^^^
Line 2, column 490, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
... for their projects. Besides, it is the teachers responsibility to tell pupils the exten...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 248, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...lling the use of phones of students and thats the reason why they have to make it loo...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, look, moreover, so, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2064.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 419.0 315.596192385 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92601431981 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68940603151 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501193317422 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 621.0 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.2142656309 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.411764706 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6470588235 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47058823529 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.376798369724 0.244688304435 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155188362775 0.084324248473 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100745777208 0.0667982634062 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.300730340732 0.151304729494 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100918450961 0.056905535591 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.