Some people believe that computers and internet carry more weight than traditional education in children’s study. Some others believe that traditional schooling and teachers are still essential and more effective. Discuss the both viewpoints and give your own opinion.
People have differing opinions of whether innovative technological devices are more beneficial to children’s learning than traditional methods. While a group of commentators state that orthodox teaching should be paid attention to education, I believe that the implement of modern teaching strategies can bring more advantages to young learners.
There are a variety of reasons elucidating why conventional teaching can not be replaceable. It is evident that traditional schooling has been employed for a long period of time, established by professional and reliable educators who put a lot of effort into education systems. Due to this fact, students’ needs are well catered by these experts. In addition, teachers are capable of individually providing students with effective instructions. This is because educators gain a rich range of experience in teaching. For example, teachers in Taiwan are required to complete 6 months placement before the application of teacher registration.
However, I argue that the innovation of technology is more likely to benefit students. Firstly, the inspiration of unique ideas and the development of creative thinking skills for young learns ensue from the use of the internet. To be more specific, students’ massive potential can be evoked by accessing the internet. Additionally, the newest gadgets can improve the learning environment. Student who live in rural areas, in particular, have a rich range of possibilities of conducting advancing experiments in school laboratories.
In conclusion, although individuals indicate the importance of traditional teaching, I believe the use of technology can lead more benefits to education.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing more advantages to young learners. There are a variety of reasons elucidati...
^^^
Line 3, column 164, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... schooling has been employed for a long period of time, established by professional and reliab...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e application of teacher registration. However, I argue that the innovation of ...
^^^
Line 5, column 194, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to ensue'
Suggestion: to ensue
...eative thinking skills for young learns ensue from the use of the internet. To be mor...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng experiments in school laboratories. In conclusion, although individuals indi...
^^^
Line 7, column 155, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gy can lead more benefits to education.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, so, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1452.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.808 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.40154317921 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.64 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.2444182989 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.714285714 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8571428571 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207470690745 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0615441488463 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560762501314 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130450219523 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387204663638 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.84 50.2224549098 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.12 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.61 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.