Some people believe that construction of new public buildings such as museums, town halls and sporting facilities is more important than renovating the existing ones, while others disagree.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
There is a growing controversy over the significance of historical building use. Whether they should serve to the public demand with a renovating touch or utterly fresh-built ones should replace them. As much as both sides present valid points, I personally am of the idea that preserving antique monuments is of high importance. In this article the polarized opinions will be briefly interpreted.
The parties that favor the construction of modern facilities often argue that the old structures are shabby and not as much util. They strongly suggest that in our world the presence of modern facilities with high-tech instruments is essential. As an instance, it would have not been possible to install surveillance cameras due to life-long fabrication of walls. Also many sport equipment cannot be exploit in old structures due to their high weight and insufficient weight tolerance of ceilings. Although these are some telling points but the discussion is by no means over.
On the other hand, the opponents of ever-escalating building instructions believe that conspicuously the economic means that associated with renovation, which clearly is lower, is the most important aspect of all. Another reason convincing them about this cause is, its great environmentally-friendly approach. Reduction of used material undoubtedly contributes to alleviating waste. Additionally, one of the major advantages that should not be neglected is the educational purpose of antique buildings use instead of simple constructing them from scratch .If this method is used, there would be an opportunity to educate a generation about the importance of reusing feasible materials instead of replacing them.
By and large, the construction of new public buildings is inevitable in our growing society. However, it is very important to preserve widely-used buildings such as old museums, town halls and sport facilities and develop them for further accommodation. From my own prespective that will contribute to a healthier environment and nothing plays a more significant role in our life rather than the environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 364, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... due to life-long fabrication of walls. Also many sport equipment cannot be exploit ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 369, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun equipment seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much sport equipment', 'a good deal of sport equipment'.
Suggestion: much sport equipment; a good deal of sport equipment
...to life-long fabrication of walls. Also many sport equipment cannot be exploit in old structures due...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 106, Rule ID: ECONOMIC_ECONOMICAL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economical' (=affordable, cheap)?
Suggestion: economical
...ructions believe that conspicuously the economic means that associated with renovation, ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 556, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...of simple constructing them from scratch .If this method is used, there would be a...
^^
Line 3, column 558, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: If
... simple constructing them from scratch .If this method is used, there would be an ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, however, if, so, such as, by and large, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1788.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53560371517 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27516721392 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631578947368 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.8693772337 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.75 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1875 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8125 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201766509321 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0549079398713 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538398392532 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115645528814 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0778808180807 0.056905535591 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.