Some people say it is manufactures and supermarkets responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of products they sell and others say it is the consumers responsibility to avoid buying products with too much packaging.
Factories and stores are increasing their own sale by using an exceed packaging to draw people’s attention. However, this trend makes an extra benefit for industries; there is a controversy with this by an array of people. On the one hand, the majority of people believe that it should be less packaging and control by manufacturers, while the others consist of it should be occurred individually. In the following, discuss both views and proved it should do if it arose from initially by producers.
To beginning with, there was a variety advantages if industrials centers reduce the volume of packaging. The first one is that this action not only could omit enormous wastes produced but also assist the environment. For example, plastics used for packaging remain intact for vast years in nature and it may never vanish during these years. Furthermore, by reducing both material demanding and price could be decline; Thus, goods are purchased more to comparison before it. These examples clear why less packaging must be considered by manufacturers and shopping centers.
In spite of reducing packaging must be operated by factories, the purchaser would pick up the species to reduce the number of product’s packages. This could be occurred by pretending shopping products which have an extra pack. As a result, consuming materials, wasting and costs are drop down. Because of this, people get involved in conserving the environment besides financials improvement indirectly.
To conclude, this essay discussed that why reducing products packages should be monitored by factories and sale centers. In addition, why people must be enrolled to avoid shopping with this kind of products. From my point of view, less packaging occurred if it controlled by manufacturers and retailers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 61, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... are increasing their own sale by using an exceed packaging to draw people's attenti...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 188, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to shop'.
Suggestion: to shop
...s. This could be occurred by pretending shopping products which have an extra pack. As a...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, thus, while, for example, in addition, kind of, as a result, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1514.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33098591549 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95026720351 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602112676056 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.4727182491 49.4020404114 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.625 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.75 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157313075951 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0532700427327 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0367348093884 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105848682556 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0339453689302 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.